I’m studying for my Excel class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study? Write a two-page paper which provides a methodology that could be followed to actually solve the case. The strategy paper need not be an actual solution to the case — it may simply explain how one would go about solving the case, step by step. The strategy paper is being prepared for the approval of a senior financial manager who is completely familiar with the background of the problem. Therefore the strategy paper should skip background details and deal only with recommended procedures. The paper is procedural rather than descriptive. The level of detail that is appropriate in describing the procedures depends upon the objective of the particular case. For example, If an important objective of the analysis is to determine the amount of additional funds that will be required to support a new project then it is obviously not sufficient to make a statement such as: “Step 3, determine the additional funds requirements.” Instead, exact and detailed procedures should be outlined for determining the amount of external financing required, being careful to identify any peculiarities or complications that are unique to that particular case.

Hello, Everything is explained below. chapter 14 is attached . This Chapter is huge so be prepared to work this week!For the Musculoskeletal System this week I have picked websites for you to research. Please pick a website and locate an article or item that interests you. Please place the topic of your post in the subject line and ask 10 questions regarding the material to your classmates. Please introduce your questions by writing a paragraph about the topic and what you learned from the article (not long, just about 5-10 sentences please.For your replies, please answer 2 complete sets of your peers questions (20 questions total). Please paste the questions within your reply. Here are your sites:Option 1: The Merck Manual Online: www.merck.com/mmhe/sec05/ch059/ch059b.html (Links to an external site.)Option 2: Ergonomics and the Musculoskeletal System: www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/risk.html (Links to an external site.)Option 3: Search a Disease or Disorder from your book at the Mayo Clinic Online Site: www.mayoclinic.org/ (Links to an external site.)Option 4: Your own site/topic. Please post our site for your peers. You may research anything within chapter 14 or that relates to the musculoskeletal chapters within this option.

Hi I need some assistance with my Essay i will link all the sources and rubrics below! “When we are not in the midst of a global pandemic, this class usually incorporates visits to local religious sites and we use this writing prompt. Attending our ‘virtual’ site visits online, you can still review and think about the questions in this writing assignment (i.e., what do you see in the video and other resources in terms of the setting, demographics of people visiting, how they use imagery and ritual, etc.). Obviously part of your paper will also be describing what you read or learned in the other linked resources (articles, webpages, etc.). Just like for an in-person site visits, the purpose is to make connections between what we have discussed about the religion in class and what you see in the materials for the ‘virtual’ visit.”The same writing rules from the writing assignment apply (i.e., 3 double spaced pages, avoiding plagiarism, etc.) apply. Please use quotation marks and provide a citation for any material that you are quoting (Townsend 23, or “Golden Temple Documentary” will be fine, as example citations). Sources: 1. https://www.britannica.com/place/Vatican-City2. 3. 4. https://www.museivaticani.va/content/museivaticani… 5.

select (3) outside readings that will help you think through the current pandemic through the lens of the course and its concepts and annotate those readings with an eye to its psychosocial dimensions. Here are some resources to help orient you to annotating sources, a tremendously important skill for paper-writing and research: Purdue OWL Annotated Bibliography Samples https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/University of New South Wales Annotated Bibliography https://student.unsw.edu.au/annotated-bibliographySkidmore College, “Writing an Annotated Bibliography” http://lib.skidmore.edu/library/index.php/li371-annotated-bibFor each of the THREE (3) annotations: Spend at least 2-3 sentences summarizing the main idea of the article, the central argument, the point of the article/podcast/document’s existence. What has it been published to do? Devote an other two or three sentences on your evaluation of the source–obviously, you didn’t choose it because you hated it, but address what drew you to it theoretically/analytically and what some of its limitations might be. Finally, spend another sentence or two on how the piece is useful for understanding a particular application of the concepts to practice in the medical field.

1) Read at least one of the following:Why All Drugs should be Legal (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Why Allowing Trophy Hunting is Good for Endangered Species (Links to an external site.2) Analyze the argument in one of the articles and write a 2-3 page (single-spaced) essay. Do you think the argument is a good argument, why or why not?In your essay be sure to lay out what you think is the thesis or main conclusion of the argument and the important premises that lead to this conclusion. Note that they may not be explicitly stated.Discuss what you think is the evidence that supports the truth of the premises and evaluate that evidence. Which premises do you think strengthen the argument and which weaken the argument?Identify and explain any explicit or implicit assumptions and value judgments the author makes, what is the author assuming is true in making her case.Evaluate the tone of the argument and point out any rhetorical strategies or fallacies that attempt to make the author’s case more persuasive to the reader.Then discuss whether you agree or disagree with the case the author is making. Give you reasons for your position. Do you think the article is persuasive and if so why? Do you share the same outrage?