Four years equates to approximately 2 million minutes; some of those minutes fly by and some feel interminably long. How do high school students around the world – those lucky enough to attend high school – spend their 2 million minutes? Before examining ‘high achieving’ students from three countries (USA, China, and India), take a moment to reflect on your own experience and how you spent your 2 million minutes? Part I: How did you spend your 2 million minutes in HS? Using a pie chart and your best memory, approximate the % of time you spent doing various activities in your four years of high school. It might be helpful to think of this in terms of hours dedicated to different activities in a typical week and extrapolate from there. Here’s an example (feel free to use your own categories and methods of calculation): II. After you’ve completed your pie chart, please watch the 2016 documentary film: Two Million Minutes https://washington.kanopy.com/video/two-million-minutes (Links to an external site.) After watching, please respond to the following questions in 1-2 paragraphs per prompt: 1) How did this film confirm or contradict what you’ve read so far in The Smartest Kids in the World? 2) Do you think the portrayals were fair; why or why not? 3) Why do you think this film was produced?

I need an explanation for this Psychology question to help me study. Hello,In the first half of this course, we learned the overview of psychological assessments, including the history of tests, ethics, what makes a good test, test utility, and test construction. Now, we are transitioning to apply that knowledge to specific types of psychological tests, including personality tests and workplace assessments. Respond to the following questions in a substantive way integrating information from your text or other scholarly sources (please include citations and references for your work): 1.Despite much effort, a definition of personality has been elusive. Why do you think this is the case? How does this influence the relationship between personality theory and personality tests?2.Personality tests generally fall under the category of Projective or Objective. Provide the definition of each. How do they relate to underlying theories of personality (i.e., do different theories apply to each category of test)? 3.How are assessments used in the workplace? How can assessments be misused in the workplace? What are some factors that need to be considered when using a personality test for hiring or promotion?4.Are you more likely to use an objective or projective personality test in the workplace? Why?

Scenario You are a new public health nurse working for the Department of Public Health, and you have been asked to create a report on one of the following vulnerable populations in your community: homeless population, ethnic or minority group, elderly, or pregnant woman and children in low socioeconomic areas. The report will provide your department with current information about your community as well as offer interventions for the selected vulnerable population within your community. Instructions Create a report on the vulnerable population you selected in “Module 07 Discussion – Vulnerable Population” that: Part One – Vulnerable Population (completed in Module 07 Discussion – Vulnerable Population) Selects one vulnerable population from below: Homeless population Ethnic or minority group Elderly Pregnant woman and children in low socioeconomic areas Describes the health determinants affecting the selected vulnerable population, including: Social and economic environment Physical environment Individual characteristics Behaviors Part Two – Public Health Nurse & Multidimensional Strategies Describes the role of the public health nurse in helping the selected vulnerable population. Develops two multidimensional strategies used as interventions for selected vulnerable population.

Introduction to Personality Theories Introduction: The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with an understanding of personality theories, specifically the five-factor model. Personality theory helps inform psychologists’ approach to understanding brain systems and behavior. This assignment fulfills/supports: Module Outcome: 1 Course Outcome: 2 General Education Competencies: 2, 4 The Assignment: For this Discussion Board, complete the following steps: Step 1 Review the various trait theories, paying special attention to the Big Five. Step 2 Choose a fictional character from a book, tv show, or movie. Think about how you would rank that character along each of the components of the five-factor model. Step 3 In your initial post, thoroughly discuss each of the following: Give some brief background about the character (no more than one paragraph). Using the five-factor model (the Big Five), provide two (2) observations for how your character fits EACH factor. For example, if I chose Winnie the Pooh, I would provide two observations about him that explain why I believe he scores high on openness, two observations for why I believe he scores low on conscientiousness, two observations for why I believe he scores low on extroversion, etc. You should have a total of ten (10) observations.

Discussion Board Post! WATCH:  VIDEO – Junot Diaz offers his thoughts on the power and function of art (1 min, 51 sec.) Diaz argues that one function of art (literature included) is to provoke or disturb us — compelling us to feel and think about uncomfortable subject matter in new ways that may expand our understanding: Prompts | Writing Task:  Respond to both of the following two questions. Include (only) the boldfaced portion of the questions with each of your responses. Prompt 1: Does “Drown” fulfill art’s function in the way Junot Diaz describes? Why / why not? How? Be direct and specific. Establish your thesis in response to this question clearly and early in your response. To support your position, offer examples, evidence from the story, properly cited. LENGTH: 1 well-developed paragraph. Prompt 2: Titles in fiction are carefully chosen. Why do you think this story is called “Drown?” This question requires you to a) draw conclusions from your close reading and reflective annotation of the story, b) form an interpretation based on insight and persuasive treatment of the evidence and c) compose a thoughtfully composed response. LENGTH: 1 well-developed paragraph. Note: This is not a vague ‘feelings’ question or an invitation to make random guesses or reach for faulty assumptions.